<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Really… Thanks Google!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/</link>
	<description>Online marketing that works</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:17:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fort Collins Web</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-973267</link>
		<dc:creator>Fort Collins Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 11:35:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-973267</guid>
		<description>Three years later and you guys are still holding strong. Nice. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three years later and you guys are still holding strong. Nice. <img src='http://www.copyblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-723732</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 07:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-723732</guid>
		<description>hahhahaha... so funny... well, PR 7 is really cool..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahhahaha&#8230; so funny&#8230; well, PR 7 is really cool..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rozhovor s Aaronom Wallom zo SEObook.com &#124; SEO chat</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-320154</link>
		<dc:creator>Rozhovor s Aaronom Wallom zo SEObook.com &#124; SEO chat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 17:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-320154</guid>
		<description>[...] Iné známe osobnosti ako Brian Clark mali PageRank upravený Google-om a potom, čo sa na to sťažovali, ich PageRank skóre bolo upravené späť. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Iné známe osobnosti ako Brian Clark mali PageRank upravený Google-om a potom, čo sa na to sťažovali, ich PageRank skóre bolo upravené späť. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 Traffic Trend Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-257391</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 Traffic Trend Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 02:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-257391</guid>
		<description>Page Rank has always been something that has confused me immensly. I see sites of excellent content with a lot of user response and Page Ranks of one or two. I then will find a site that is very basic without a lot of activity ranking 4 or 5. I have also conducted search terms on popular keyword phrases thinking that the #1 positions would have really high page ranks and sometimes they don&#039;t . My site has a page rank of zero and I work hard at it getting contact and resourcing as much as possible and I remain at zero.  I just kind of give up. PR in my opinion is over rated. As long as we get good google rankings and lots of search engine traffic then what does it matter what our PR is?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page Rank has always been something that has confused me immensly. I see sites of excellent content with a lot of user response and Page Ranks of one or two. I then will find a site that is very basic without a lot of activity ranking 4 or 5. I have also conducted search terms on popular keyword phrases thinking that the #1 positions would have really high page ranks and sometimes they don&#8217;t . My site has a page rank of zero and I work hard at it getting contact and resourcing as much as possible and I remain at zero.  I just kind of give up. PR in my opinion is over rated. As long as we get good google rankings and lots of search engine traffic then what does it matter what our PR is?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Page Rank Checker - Many Websites Reporting a Drop in PR - PR9 to PR5 &#187; How To Start And Grow Your Internet Business</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-211470</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Page Rank Checker - Many Websites Reporting a Drop in PR - PR9 to PR5 &#187; How To Start And Grow Your Internet Business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 06:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-211470</guid>
		<description>[...] Brian Clark&#8217;s Copyblogger was reported to have been demoted to a PR4 but again, during the writing of this post, it is now at PR 7. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Brian Clark&#8217;s Copyblogger was reported to have been demoted to a PR4 but again, during the writing of this post, it is now at PR 7. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO CheckList &#187; Does PageRank Have Anything to do With your Rankings?</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-200722</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO CheckList &#187; Does PageRank Have Anything to do With your Rankings?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-200722</guid>
		<description>[...] text links. And in truth, many of those de-ranked (me included) have not sold text links at all. Copyblogger, Brian Clark, was of the same sentiment. Other bloggers have hinted that his blog getting de-ranked was due to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] text links. And in truth, many of those de-ranked (me included) have not sold text links at all. Copyblogger, Brian Clark, was of the same sentiment. Other bloggers have hinted that his blog getting de-ranked was due to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Site Optimization &#187; The Great Google Data Grab of 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-170340</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Site Optimization &#187; The Great Google Data Grab of 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 10:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-170340</guid>
		<description>[...] with Google, how easy will it be for them to force compliance on smaller webmasters? Given the indiscriminate attitude exhibited when Google recently hand edited PageRank scores, it seems there is good reason to not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with Google, how easy will it be for them to force compliance on smaller webmasters? Given the indiscriminate attitude exhibited when Google recently hand edited PageRank scores, it seems there is good reason to not [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hadiah dari Google: Penalti PageRank</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-163459</link>
		<dc:creator>Hadiah dari Google: Penalti PageRank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 03:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-163459</guid>
		<description>[...] Tapi tentu saja bukan saya yang menentukan aturan di sini. Google yang menentukan. Dan Google akhirnya memutuskan untuk mengurangi PR situs saya tersebut menjadi PR4. Saya tidak tahu bagaimana caranya Google bisa sampai pada kesimpulan kalau saya menjual link. Tapi saya bisa menebak bahwa cara mereka tidak terlalu canggih amat. Buktinya ada pada kejadian yang menimpa Brian Clark. Blog CopyBlogger miliknya terkena penalti dari PR6 menjadi PR4. Ini terjadi walaupun kenyataannya Scott sama sekali tidak menjual link di blog miliknya. Untungnya kemudian Google memulihkan dan menambah PR CopyBlogger menjadi PR7. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tapi tentu saja bukan saya yang menentukan aturan di sini. Google yang menentukan. Dan Google akhirnya memutuskan untuk mengurangi PR situs saya tersebut menjadi PR4. Saya tidak tahu bagaimana caranya Google bisa sampai pada kesimpulan kalau saya menjual link. Tapi saya bisa menebak bahwa cara mereka tidak terlalu canggih amat. Buktinya ada pada kejadian yang menimpa Brian Clark. Blog CopyBlogger miliknya terkena penalti dari PR6 menjadi PR4. Ini terjadi walaupun kenyataannya Scott sama sekali tidak menjual link di blog miliknya. Untungnya kemudian Google memulihkan dan menambah PR CopyBlogger menjadi PR7. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Google Gift: PageRank Penalty</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-162912</link>
		<dc:creator>A Google Gift: PageRank Penalty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 10:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-162912</guid>
		<description>[...] But of course, I&#8217;m not the one who set the rules. Google does. And Google did demote my site to PR4. I don&#8217;t know how Google come to conclusion that I sold text links. But I can only guess that their methods are not that sophisticated. One glaring example is what happened to Brian Clark. His CopyBlogger blog suffered a penalty, demoted from PR6 to PR4. This despite the fact that Brian doesn&#8217;t sell links on his blog. Fortunately Google restored CopyBlogger&#8217;s PR later to &#8230; PR7. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] But of course, I&#8217;m not the one who set the rules. Google does. And Google did demote my site to PR4. I don&#8217;t know how Google come to conclusion that I sold text links. But I can only guess that their methods are not that sophisticated. One glaring example is what happened to Brian Clark. His CopyBlogger blog suffered a penalty, demoted from PR6 to PR4. This despite the fact that Brian doesn&#8217;t sell links on his blog. Fortunately Google restored CopyBlogger&#8217;s PR later to &#8230; PR7. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrit</title>
		<link>http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really-thanks-google/#comment-161847</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:22:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.copyblogger.com/no-really%e2%80%a6-thanks-google/#comment-161847</guid>
		<description>Rofl nice sarcasm. I am glad that copyblogger gained back their PR and actually got upgraded for 1 score, but I can&#039;t say the same for problogger unfortunately...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rofl nice sarcasm. I am glad that copyblogger gained back their PR and actually got upgraded for 1 score, but I can&#8217;t say the same for problogger unfortunately&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Object Caching 318/322 objects using apc

Served from: copyblogger.wphost.co @ 2012-02-09 11:37:34 -->
