Which Words Can You Live Without?

by Brian Clark

Editing Your Writing

On November 19th, 1863, popular orator Edward Everett gave a two-hour speech that nobody remembers. Following Everett, President Abraham Lincoln stood up, delivered 269 words now known as the Gettysburg Address, and sat down. Lincoln’s two-minute speech is regarded as one of the greatest in American history.

Experts from Strunk and White to Stephen King agree:

Omit needless words.

Related Articles

Copyblogger runs on the Thesis Theme for WordPress

Thesis WordPress theme

Thesis is the search engine optimized WordPress theme of choice for serious online publishers. If you’re a blogger who doesn’t understand a lot of PHP, Thesis will give you a ton of functionality without having to alter any code. For the advanced, Thesis has incredible customization possibilities via Thesis hooks.

With so many design options, you can use the template over and over and never have it look like the same site. The theme is robust and flexible enough not only to accommodate a site like Copyblogger, but also to enable the site to run far more efficiently than it ever has before.

{ 9 trackbacks }

Live Without (too many) Words « Great Presentations Mean Business
July 11, 2007 at 9:41 pm
What’s Wrong With PowerPoint? at Fool for Five
July 12, 2007 at 6:05 am
The Total Résumé Makeover | So You Want To Teach?
July 18, 2007 at 10:01 am
Two Techniques That Help You Embrace Brevity | Copyblogger
July 18, 2007 at 10:56 am
Live Without (too many) Words - [TEST BLOG]
August 24, 2008 at 12:42 am
How Twitter Makes You A Better Writer — Copyblogger
March 25, 2009 at 10:21 am
Twitter Makes You a Better Writer? « Goins, Writer
May 19, 2009 at 9:48 am
4 Tips For Improving The Conversation On Your Blog : Performancing
July 11, 2009 at 11:39 pm
How Twitter makes you a better writer |
July 27, 2009 at 2:39 am

{ 45 comments… read them below or add one }

1 Chris July 11, 2007 at 9:20 pm

Interesting point. Abe Lincoln was famous for being right on the target, and I guess the American public was just tired of the Civil War, so he cut the speech short.

This has inspired me to write a new topic at my forum http://www.nerdcouncil.com – I’ll make it as short as possible.

2 GoingLikeSixty July 11, 2007 at 9:28 pm

I used to avoid sentence fragments like the plague.
That’s OK now. Thanks for the confidence boost.

3 Laura July 11, 2007 at 9:30 pm

This is so on target!! In fact, I posted on avoiding redundancy in writing yesterday.

Of course, your post is shorter and more to the point. It’s probably also more memorable.

4 Hamlet Batista July 11, 2007 at 10:12 pm

I was hoping to read more, but the fact that you made your point by writing less is remarkable.

5 Sherwin July 11, 2007 at 11:46 pm

Holistic. I hate that word! It’s a word politicians in my country use all the time. Every plan is a/an holistic plan.

And no, it’s not that country. My sister is not #4 prostitute :D

6 John July 12, 2007 at 12:14 am

I agree. We don’t need redundant words. Be simple.

7 Susie July 12, 2007 at 12:25 am

I love the Gettysburg Address… it’s simple yet eloquent.. that reminds me.. when growing up, my dad used to liked to give us lectures that would last couple of hours. That was one of our punishments. I remember my leg falling asleep sometimes.. man did he like to talk.. but it was couple of sentences he said from time to time.. (not during lecture) that I remember the most.

8 William Profet July 12, 2007 at 1:48 am

Quality over quantity!

The number of words doesn’t matter. The power, emotion and value they bring to the reader – that’s important.

So, I agree – throw away needless words. :)

9 Joanna Young July 12, 2007 at 1:49 am

The other thing that’s interesting about the Address is the number of times that he used “here” (I think it’s 8). I wonder if some editors would have said that at least one of those uses was redundant? And yet it’s the repetition and emphasis of “here” that adds power to the speech.

A neat reminder that it’s not just the number of words but how you use them.

Joanna

10 Matt July 12, 2007 at 3:50 am

In 1773, Samuel Johnson advised writers to be harsh with their word count: “Read over your compositions,” he said, “and where ever you meet with a passage which you think is particularly fine, strike it out.” History shows the benefits of ruthless editing.

11 Amrit Hallan July 12, 2007 at 4:56 am

It all depends what you are trying to convey, but yes, especially when you are writing, and more specially when you are copywriting, needless words do more harm than good.

In literature I’m quite flexible though. Sometimes when you read Dostoevsky or Dickens, you feel like they just go on and on. But I love these guys as writers.

12 shane July 12, 2007 at 5:40 am

HA!, I too was looking for the more link, then I clicked on the title thinking Opera was doing the nasty with me again. Ok Brian you’re a card !!! Umm is this a record for you? “the shortest post on copyblogger?”

13 Geoff July 12, 2007 at 6:31 am

I’m sure the brevity of this post is intentional as well.

14 Beth Cole July 12, 2007 at 6:51 am

I couldn’t agree more. Brevity is courtesy!

15 MisssyM July 12, 2007 at 8:06 am

Wise words

16 ShaneSw July 12, 2007 at 8:06 am

Agreed.

17 Brian Clark July 12, 2007 at 9:05 am

OK everyone, I do admit to playing editor here. Muhammad wrote a nice longer article on brevity, and I said “We can’t write at length on brevity… it’s just not right!” :)

Sometime in the near future we will publish the rest of the piece, because Mu had two techniques and some great examples on how to omit needless words.

18 Roshawn July 12, 2007 at 10:59 am

Like everyone else, I agree.

However, I find it difficult to be brief when writing my novel. Oh well, I guess I’ll have a lot of rewriting to do.

19 Ben Yoskovitz July 12, 2007 at 11:31 am

I try and eliminate the phrase, “I think” when writing on my blog. It’s my blog, of course they’re my thoughts. You don’t really need to preface your own thoughts with the phrase, “I think.”

20 redwall_hp July 12, 2007 at 11:55 am

Jabberwocky.

21 Adam Pieniazek July 12, 2007 at 12:41 pm

You dissing my homeboy, Edward Everett (his house in Dorchester, Ma is seconds from mine)?

Why dems fighting words good sir!

22 F July 12, 2007 at 1:46 pm

I totally agree. I grew up learining to write like that, so I was totally in my element – but later on in my school career my family moved and that school district was very into formulaic writing, and adding a lot of “BS” to papers. I had a very hard time learning how to add fluff to a paper, and even then I still ended up short! I had one teacher though that appreciated it a lot.

23 Nick Bakewell July 12, 2007 at 1:48 pm

Wow, funny – I just went to Gettysburg yesterday and heard about this, and now it’s a post! Haha…anyways, it is a great point. Rambling is bad. Ever notice how paragraphs in newspapers are only 2 to 3 sentences long? They’re straight and to the point, no frills. Keep the user’s attention.

24 Dave Navarro July 12, 2007 at 3:33 pm

Maybe it wasn’t the speech itself …

… but the fact a politician gave a speech that short. Now that’s history-making. :-)

Of course, words can save you too – Teddy Roosevelt was shot in the chest in 1912, but the manuscript for his upcoming speech deflected the bullet.

http://www.historybuff.com/library/refteddy.html

’nuff said!

25 legbamel July 12, 2007 at 3:49 pm

Bring on the techniques! I think a lot of people, including me, could use some pointers.

26 John Place July 12, 2007 at 4:28 pm

Instead of omitting redunant words, I say omit them all! :)

Let’s all stop reading and go jogging.

27 Hafiz Rahman July 13, 2007 at 1:05 am

@ legbamel : I think the title of this post is the short version of the technique.

Just write and see if you can find words we can remove, sentences we can replace with shorter ones, and so on.

I’m still learning this as well, so this post is a nice boost.

28 Edward July 13, 2007 at 2:30 am

I fully agree with your insightful perspective, actually there is a similar thread at Frontier Blog
( http://www.hwswworld.com/wp )

29 Alfa July 13, 2007 at 12:31 pm

Good editing, Brian. I’ll now be more careful with the many-ness of my words. :-D

30 David Zemens July 13, 2007 at 10:32 pm

The most difficult class I took in college was a freshman composition class. The purpose of the class was to teach the students to write concisely. It’s hard to be brief and choose the right words, and I had not been reminded about it for quite some time until reading this post. Now I am going to try and write much more succinctly in the future.

31 Tips Of All Sorts July 14, 2007 at 6:36 am

Don’t forget about numbering or the use of bullet points! Would you rather read a long paragraph or have it laid out in point form?

32 Brian Clark July 14, 2007 at 6:41 am

We certainly wouldn’t forget about that. :)

But there is a fundamental difference between content structure and brevity. Writing list items and bullet points that communicate more with fewer words would be a combination of the two concepts.

33 Lawton July 15, 2007 at 12:05 am

Brevity, and the use of it, is paramount in writing great copy. This is what I’ve learned from this post and others like Joe Sugerman.

It seems though, that are certain lines of copy essential and it’s hard for me to sometimes figure out, “hey, does this really need to go or can it stay?” Is it important enough?

That’s where the rubber meets the road.

34 Rob O. July 15, 2007 at 6:31 am

Some of my favorite – and hopefully most effective – posts are those that I’ve rehashed over the course of multiple edits. I often compose blog posts off-line just so I’ll have the opportunity to review and distill the content down prior to pressing the “publish” button.

35 Simon July 16, 2007 at 4:51 am

I guess the art is to be simple and to the point, yet give enough detail to get the point across. I am a fan of lists in blog “articles” also!

36 Ad Tracker July 17, 2007 at 3:36 pm

I know and understand that short pithy posts are much more efficient but I always feel the need to explain everything and fill in the background information because I don’t want my readers to be confsed and take away the wrong impr …Oh, you know what I mean ;)

37 LaurenMarie July 18, 2007 at 2:56 pm

Many of us had teachers in school that required a minimum essay length (5 pages, 40 pages, whatever). We learned to write superfluously to fill up those papers with empty words! Now you’re telling me I must unlearn what they taught me in school? ;)

38 milenka July 19, 2007 at 7:20 am

I agree. KISS (Keep It Short and Simple)

39 Tai McQueen July 19, 2007 at 4:59 pm

I’ve heard that the first draft of “The Old Man and the Sea” was over 400 pages. Brevity is the soul of a masterpiece.

40 Krish Mandal October 10, 2007 at 2:50 pm

in other words: eschew obfuscation?

41 Gia April 7, 2009 at 4:02 pm

This is an incredible post. I am a wordy writer; I love detailed words. But I know there is a better way to achieve this. Thanks!

42 Fiona Fell - websitePROFITS April 14, 2009 at 6:01 pm

I have forced myself to write with brevity top of mind. I have imposed a 37 word limit on each of my ‘posts’.


websitePROFITS: Profit Boosting Tips in 37 words or less!

43 Michel August 24, 2009 at 10:06 am

I chuckled after reading this post, I thought it would’ve been longer! I have an affinity to look at the number of words in my blog posts as I write to make sure I have at least 250 down. I usually try to play with brevity by offering a video to compliment the short post.

44 Kona November 27, 2009 at 10:22 pm

Sometimes is not a matter of words. A good graphic or image is often more powerful and persuasive online than even the most succinct text.

45 affiliate marketing forum December 18, 2009 at 3:44 am

“Omit needless words.”

Lesson for the day :)

Really cool post by the way.

Leave a Comment

Previous post: How to Become a Heroic Business Blogger

Next post: Link Karma